This has proved to be untrue on many levels.
Racial disparity in sentencing essay those declarations remind readers of any public figure from Donald J. The column caused letters, statements, and petitions from students and professors at Penn and elsewhere attacking the column as racist, white supremacist, xenophobic, and hate speech.
Then, the problem exists of allowing unpopular speakers at college campuses. Astonishingly, student protests at Brandeis University caused cancelation of the world premiere of a play based on the life of comedian Lenny Bruce. The theater professors agreed, announcing that the play "may cause discomfort, including the legacy of Lenny Bruce" and additional educational programming must accompany such play.
Bruce was prosecuted in for "obscenity"; Brecht was summoned before the U. House of Representatives Committee on Un-American Activities in because of the radical content of his writing.
The National Association of Scholars claims that hatred of America is now instilled in American schoolchildren from an early age, not as "hatred" itself, but in words such as "social justice," "multiculturalism," "resistance," or similar language suggesting aversion to people who exploit everyone else.
Probably, the best and most courageous analyst of free speech on American college campuses is Professor Amy Wax at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. Five law school professors accused the authors of praising the s. Later, 33 professors recommended students report any "stereotyping and bias" they might perceive from Professor Wax.
We should return to doing that on our college campuses and in our society at large.
Inhis first year as Governor, Brown opposed immigrants entering the U. South Vietnam and Cambodia were defeated by Communists in April, Hundreds of thousands of refugees sought entry.
Supporting Brown were U. As always, the truth about aliens is malleable, and politicians are trimmers; they love illegal aliens as part of their politics. As the son of a legal immigrant and husband of another legal immigrant, I scratch my head in dismay.
I refrain no more because of failure of a necessary four-fifths majority of the five-member Commission to approve restoration of anti-corruption laws which were approved by voters inthen repealed by Board of Supervisors action in Bear in mind that the Charter law over 20 years ago requires a four-fifths approval of Commissioners to submit a proposed strengthening of ethics requirements to the Board of Supervisors for submission to voters or submission to voters by the Commission itself.
The nonprofit entities succeeded in stopping the prohibition of behest payments in the proposed ordinance in favor of simply a disclosure of "behest" donations by contractors, planners, architects, and developers to designated charities.
As I stated last December, how many citizens possess an interest in reading City Hall ethics forms? Not very many, in my long experience. That incited nonprofit entities to bombard Ethics Commission members and staff with catastrophic objections, claiming they the nonprofit corporations never tried to exercise undue influence and such act by the Ethics Commission would diminish donations substantially.
The infestation of nonprofits is remarkable. Moreover, the same nonprofits succeeded in deleting a clause conferring the ability of a citizen to sue for such ethics and conflict of interest violations if the City Attorney or District Attorney refuses to act after 90 days of a complaint to the Ethics Commission.
State law contains numerous such provisions, but the nonprofits were able to claim that unidentified but well-heeled entities and individuals would find ways to harass charities with frivolous lawsuits. The culmination occurred February 16, at the Ethics Commission meeting, with two Commissioners voting against even conveying a weakened law to the Board of Supervisors, after one had told Chairman Peter Keane he would support him.
That led Peter Keane to resign from the Commission immediately, a saddening event. Best laid plans have gone awry.
It will consist of saying, in the very midst of the sound and the fury of our history: Let us rejoice, indeed, in having witnessed the death of a lying and comfort-loving Europe and it being faced with cruel truths.
High-speed rail began operating in in Japan in time for the Olympic Games. Most were built with private investors, together with public funds. One essential is operating on track dedicated only to high-speed rail, not shared with commuter or freight service.
It began even though all the right-of-way by eminent domain from farmers and ranchers was not secured. Highway 99 trail, rather than Interstate 5, which possesses no cities with potential ridership for revenue to pay operating expenses. That meant acquisition of an additional 50 feet of right-of-way on the Peninsula to avert sharing the Caltrain right-of-way.
In the aforementioned countries, to cover costs, high-speed rail must operate trains during peak hours of 7: Inthe Authority board contemplated funding from the state bond, plus federal and regional funds from areas along the route which wanted high-speed rail for commercial development and consequent employment increases.
Oh, those cruel truths! Retired former Supervisor, State Senator and Judge Quentin Kopp lives in District 7 February Some wag once declared that if a man carries his own lantern, he need not fear darkness.
That pithy statement seems appropriate as I end another year of musings about the state of affairs in country, state, and city.Death penalty is a human rights violation. With the death penalty, you are deliberately deciding punishment by death for a criminal.
This is the same concept as eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth. U.S. Justice Department and Racial Inequality Racial inequality in the criminal justice system is a belief that through research and statistics is a structural inequality that exists at different levels noted throughout the system stemming from those convicted and those convicting.
Exemplification Essay: Separation of Church and State - Because of my strong beliefs, I have been called the Antichrist, a witch, an atheist, and a Satanist. Access to The Champion archive is restricted to NACDL members. However, this page and others deemed to serve the public interest - as opposed to a narrower benefit to the criminal defense profession - are left unprotected for access by all interested persons.
I think there’s an important part of Ezra Klein’s piece that you’re not addressing. Specifically this: In other words, we police black communities more heavily and we are more aggressive about enforcing drug laws against . “Racial Disparity in Sentencing” Many people feel that race is no longer an issue in today’s society - Racial Disparity in Sentencing Essay introduction.
Race still does and always will play a major role in people today and in the many years to come. Racial disparity is a major issue that will especially in the criminal justice field.